| 23 | | === Why is the attributes number and meaning different on the diks? === |
| 24 | | |
| 25 | | Unlike other parts of SMART (logs, self-tests), the attributes are not |
| 26 | | (and never were) part of the ATA standards. Even the general attribute |
| 27 | | format (ID, VALUE, WORST, RAW) is removed from the standard since ATA-4 (1998). |
| 28 | | |
| 29 | | Attribute assignment and interpretation are vendor/device specific and |
| 30 | | undocumented in many cases. |
| 31 | | |
| 32 | | ---- |
| 33 | | |
| | 43 | |
| | 44 | ---- |
| | 45 | |
| | 46 | === Why is the attributes number and meaning different on the diks? === |
| | 47 | |
| | 48 | Unlike other parts of SMART (logs, self-tests), the attributes are not |
| | 49 | (and never were) part of the ATA standards. Even the general attribute |
| | 50 | format (ID, VALUE, WORST, RAW) is removed from the standard since ATA-4 (1998). |
| | 51 | |
| | 52 | Attribute assignment and interpretation are vendor/device specific and |
| | 53 | undocumented in many cases. |
| | 54 | |
| | 55 | ---- |
| | 56 | |
| | 57 | === What details can be interpreted from {{{Raw read error rate}}}? === |
| | 58 | |
| | 59 | If no documentation is available, the RAW value of attribute 1 is typically useless. |
| | 60 | The 48-bit field might encode several values, try {{{-v 1,hex48}}} to check. |