Custom Query (1556 matches)
Results (451 - 453 of 1556)
| Ticket | Resolution | Summary | Owner | Reporter |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1803 | invalid | NVME support | ||
| Description |
Please add support for ADATA SX8200PNP NVMe drive. What actions are required from me to implement this request? |
|||
| #316 | fixed | improvements for the systemd service file | ||
| Description |
I think the service file for smartmontools could be improved:
The second point has already been requested in ticket 194, but was not implemented. I think having the 'EnvironmentFile=' line in the service file is more confusing than helpful, so please consider removing it. |
|||
| #1013 | worksforme | -M exec overrides -M <others> | ||
| Description |
Forwarded from: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=893657 (Issue (1) described bellow may not apply to upstream smartmontools, as /etc/smartmontools/run.d/10mail seems to be a Debian-specific file... but at least issue (2) should apply to upstream smartmontools as well.) Hi. I've stumbled over the following issues in smartd: At first I had bascally the following smartd.conf: DEVICESCAN -d auto -d removable -n standby,4 -a -m root,mylocaluser,my@email.com -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner In order to test it, I've added -M test. Now on restart, only root got mail, and the postfix logs didn't even show any tries for mylocaluser and my@…. I've added -M once, as I assumed the support for comma-separated multiple addresses as explained in the smartd.conf manpage for -m, may just not work with -M-exec-invoked /etc/smartmontools/run.d/10mail but only with -M once, -M daily or -M diminishing (and that this might be some other mail sender than /etc/smartmontools/run.d/10mail - which it actually seems to be). Interestingly, it still didn't work. Only if I removed -M exec... I got mail sent to all three recipients. So I think there are two issues here: 1) /etc/smartmontools/run.d/10mail, which seems to be used per default by debian (as there is no -M once or so) should support multiple addresses in -m. It's likely not obvious to the user that there are two methods of sending warning mails, and it should just work as one would naively assume by reading the documentation of -m. 2) In contrast to what the manpage claims, it seems that if -M exec is in place, -M once/etc. are not executed as well. IMO both are severity=important, as they may prevent information about failing drives being passed on. Cheers, Chris. |
|||
